Watson Campaign Automation Ideas
Submit new product ideas for Watson Campaign Automation, Watson Real-time Personalization, Watson Content Hub and Universal Behavior Exchange. Before you submit, please review existing ideas; if an idea close to yours already exists, it's better to add comments or vote on the existing idea. We will review your ideas and use them to help prioritize our product development. Best of all, the portal will automatically update you when the status of your idea has been changed.
Connect with your peers and IBM experts on the Watson Marketing and Commerce Community
Submit ideas for other Watson Customer Engagement Products:
• Other Watson Marketing solutions
• Watson Commerce
• Watson Supply Chain
When I enter a hyperlink into a WCA mailing and link to a WCA landing page the link is "transformed" by WCA meaning some URL parameters are appended in order for the target page to be personalized to the recipient opening the link.
These parameters consist of the 4 following attributes: pMailingID, spUserID, spJobID and spReportId
For 3 of these 4 attributes corresponding placeholders exist in WCA:
In order to manually construct a personalized link to a landing page a placeholder for spReportId is required. I would like such a placeholder to exist.
How will this idea be used?
The reason why we want to manually construct personalized links to landing pages is because of the requirements for the HTML code of mailing templates.
In order to address MS Outlook devices for specific uses cases, e.g. Bulletproof Buttons (see https://buttons.cm) or generally when conditional comments are used in mailing templates, URLs can be part of tags which are not Anchor-Tags
Example: <a href="http://example.com">
If a URL is not used within an Anchor-Tag it is
1) not turned into a tracking link by WCA
In order to be able to use any type of HTML the customer wishes to use, it would be really useful to construct this manually, similar to being able and build tracking links using DLL.
|What is your industry?||Non-Industry Specific|
|What is the idea priority?||Urgent|
|Link to original RFE|